First of alll, thanks a lot for your very interesting input, I much appreciate the time you took to answer me.
When I prepared the review, I tried to have a wider spectrum, larger view than only on the HM à Grande Sonnerie.
Then I began to think about what's called a Grande Complication ( I didn't find an unique definition ) and a complication.
When you think " Grande Complication ", you have in mind names such as PP or VC.
So, I made some searches, and I checked all the material I found or heard here and there.
Of course, the complications I numbered on the PP Sky Moon Tourbillon were those I found on the official PP Press File on this watch!
The same for the VC Tour De L'Ile.
So, the method used by JLC here to number the complication is the same than the one used by PP and VC.
BUT, and as you said, the " BUT " is important... , I agree with your point of view about the " escalade " of the Grandes Complications ".
I mean that the most important here is not the number of complications, but the way they are displayed, like on the PP pr the VC.
IMO, those " Grandes Complications " develop a thema.
PP and VC the Astronomical complications, JLC the Striking complications, and all of them are brilliant, if we follow this criteria.
In comparison, the VC Aeternitas Mega 4 wants to make too much, and doesn't offer the same coherence.
The most important, obviously, is not the quantity, but the quality.
Best!
Nicolas
This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-11-13 22:35:28 This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-11-13 22:37:47