#1 and then #3 - nice to have something to hope for .... [nt]

Apr 15, 2011,02:16 AM
 

No message body

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

IF....we had a triple cal manual..what would you prefer, 1,2 or 3???

 
 By: Miranda : April 14th, 2011-12:49
MUT moon 1 MUT moon 2 MUT moon 3...  

Fun!

 
 By: dr.kol : April 14th, 2011-13:00
In my eyes #1 looks really cool - perhaps partly because of the metal. Such a watch in the size of 33-34 mm would also make a nice watch for the ladies. Best, Kari

3 for me... very JLC...

 
 By: foversta : April 14th, 2011-13:23
About the number 1... you also have the Lange option: After all, the big date system comes from JLC... Fx...  

I would first dream about some tear drop lugs.

 
 By: amanico : April 14th, 2011-13:28
Then, not the 2, ugly, nor the 3, too Patek. On the base of the first one, I would remove the date from the moonphase indicator, to put it all around the dial, on the outer part of the dial, like on the Vintage one. 38 mm would be a perfect size. Aaah, da... 

Like this?

 
 By: TdotBean : April 14th, 2011-20:52
Would you make an exception for a color metal watch then? Cover of Zaf's book Best, Tyler...  

Let's make it simple. Yes. In SS. :) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : April 14th, 2011-22:37
No message body

So this is 1b - or maybe rather a number 4, moving on top ! :))

 
 By: hs111 : April 15th, 2011-09:07
Variant of 1 - with the appeal of the fabulous Vintage TDM, how very nice ! - Tear-drops , drops of hope.. - Black dial (?) Pls let the Red arrow for the date pointer re-appear. - 39mm sounds great All what is, has been ( Ben Akiba, I think) - to a degree... 

1 for me [nt]

 
 By: Hororgasm : April 14th, 2011-15:20
No message body

I like # 3

 
 By: byronium : April 14th, 2011-15:59
To me, it seems the more balanced, and less cluttered of the two. Yes, the hands will ocassionally obscure the month and day windows in a way that makes them difficult to read, but I feel that it's a small price to pay for a cleaner look and to make it ea... 

Both 1 & 3 look great to me...

 
 By: grumio : April 14th, 2011-16:05
I would also agree with amanico that moving the date from around the moonphase to around the edge of the dial, with a red, or perhaps blue, date hand would be another option. Perhaps drop the sweep second, and fit a sub-second instead. Some teardrop lugs,... 

1 for a classic look, but ...

 
 By: AndrewD : April 14th, 2011-18:26
... 3 is more legible. But we still have the issue with the pointer date, so in fact Foversta's Lange example is the best choice! Andrew

3 for me

 
 By: Damo : April 14th, 2011-22:48
altough I really like the new mut moon. Its not a triple calendar but its superb, except that I don't understand why they have to add 'automatic' below the moon phase....

#1 for me although it reminds me of PP.

 
 By: patrickmaniac : April 15th, 2011-01:04
cheers PAt

1 for me.

 
 By: Davo : April 15th, 2011-04:11
Love everything about it.

Number 1 without hesitation [nt]

 
 By: emcquillan : April 15th, 2011-04:50
No message body

#1 for me, windows on #2 and #3

 
 By: Robert_ : April 15th, 2011-05:36
just seem awkward to me. Robert

#1, please :-)

 
 By: FanFrancisco : April 15th, 2011-09:39

1

 
 By: Mostel : April 15th, 2011-17:35
thanks.

I would have to say 1 3 2 in that order. [nt]

 
 By: Ruckdee : April 16th, 2011-05:46
No message body