Comments: view entire thread

 

Jaeger LeCoultre Geophysic: for the explorer, the adventurer, or simply for the everyday!

 
 By: 219 : June 4th, 2014-15:16
Fittingly held at Mr. Fogg’s, on Bruton Lane, which for the Londoners among us is just off Berkeley Square in the heart of Mayfair, Stephane Belmont introduced the new Geophysic to the attending press. For a watch that was originally linked to the crossin...  

Bravo Andrew, very interesting review........

 
 By: Sandgroper : June 4th, 2014-18:26
I was really interested in the Steel version until I read your review. Now I am dreaming of the Platinum;) Cheers and thank you very much. Francois from Down Under

Thanks. Should definitely take a look at both, although the

 
 By: 219 : June 5th, 2014-02:02
platinum one will require access to a JLC Boutique! Might want to get your name on a list early! 58 watches - thats less than 3 per hourly time zone! Andrew H

Pleasure! nt.

 
 By: 219 : June 5th, 2014-02:03
.

The journey of SSN-571 is....

 
 By: BDLJ : June 5th, 2014-00:56
...one of my overly anoraky interests, so forgive me for the pedantry: The USS Nautilus was under Commander Anderson, he wasn't a Captain. And I believe the watches were presented after the success of Operation Sunshine.

And your anorak serves you well! Yes, you are right

 
 By: 219 : June 5th, 2014-01:17
and that will teach me to write up late at night! Thanks for reading. I think I managed to get the rest correct!! Andrew H

From Nautilus 90 North:

 
 By: BDLJ : June 5th, 2014-14:28
"I had recently been presented with a handsome gold wrist watch by the Navy League of the United States. I asked if he would, on his return tWashington, send it to my wife." p 18-19 This was just before the kick off of Operation Sunshine. The only mention... 

The operation: JUly / August 1957. The delivery of the watch to the Commanders

 
 By: amanico : June 5th, 2014-22:40
Calvert and Anderson: 16th of December 1958. Best, Nicolas

How embarrassing …

 
 By: HerrK : June 5th, 2014-05:07
… must it have been for Mr. Belmont to give his address right in front of a supersized vintage Geophysic ad that reads „Chronometre Geophysic“, when the reedition is just not that: a Chronometer! I feel sorry for him. Thank you for your report from that l... 

indeed. [nt]

 
 By: Ilja : June 5th, 2014-05:21

Agreed.

 
 By: DTL : June 5th, 2014-23:18
nt

What would you say...

 
 By: sfoskett : June 6th, 2014-13:52
What would you say if Jaeger-LeCoultre had branded this "Geomatic" instead of "Geophysic"? Obviously the automatic movement would then be excusable, but would you like the watch then? The Geomatic is arguably better known than its short-lived predecessor,... 

Easy enough

 
 By: sfoskett : June 7th, 2014-07:24
Just slap a JLC Calibre 899 in there instead of the 898 and you've got a date!

In a nutshell: no!

 
 By: HerrK : June 11th, 2014-03:54
Apart from the missing date that Nicolas pointed out already, it would be as wrong a printing Geophysic on the dial. The watch is neither a Geomatic, nor a Geophysic. It is a reedition, remake, tribute or whatever you like to call it of one of the histori... 

On another side, there was no mention of the name Geophysic on the dial of the original..

 
 By: amanico : June 11th, 2014-05:14
I've triple checked this detail before answering, in order to avoid to be shot.. ;) No, on the original, the name Geophysic, along with Chronometer, was mentionned on the blue " sticker ", glued on the case back. So, no risk of confusion.. Best, Nicolas

Which is another good reason ...

 
 By: HerrK : June 11th, 2014-06:34
... not to print Geophysic on the dial of the remake. Ok, I will stop remonstrating now! ;-) Christian

There is hope!

 
 By: stromer : June 7th, 2014-13:12
Today I visited my AD and could have a look into the JLC dealer documentation for the Tribute to Geophysic. And guess what: The pictures showed dials that were marked "Geophysic" just below the JLC logo and "Automatic" in the lower half of the dial (where... 

It will be like this...

 
 By: amanico : June 7th, 2014-13:19
SS on the left, Pt on the right: ...  

Thank you Andrew

 
 By: Dje : June 5th, 2014-23:33
Hi Andrew, Thank you for your report. I hope to see the final watches someday. Best Dje

Thanks Jerome. Good to hear from you. And yes, try and get to see

 
 By: 219 : June 7th, 2014-01:03
the watches. As ever, the watches are always so much more in the metal than on photos. Never mind how good or bad the photographer is. Andrew H

Thx for the nice & comprehensive report.. Looking forward to seeing those in the real !!

 
 By: hs111 : June 6th, 2014-03:50
Also thanks for again highlighting the historical background, and the " philosophy" behind the marvellous original.. Specifically curious on the on-the-wrist appeal of the new crosshair edition(s) Best & HAGWE ! hs

Thank you for this report, Andrew!

 
 By: blomman Mr Blue : June 6th, 2014-04:02
Hope to see this one in the metal soon. Best Blomman

Good report, thanks

 
 By: gup502 : June 6th, 2014-06:34
It will indeed be interesting to see the real thing.

Thanks for Posting

 
 By: JLC Enthusiast : June 7th, 2014-00:10
I'm looking forward to seeing one of these for real... The Steel is the one that I really like as the cross hairs really add to the dial IMHO and though I like gold watches, not sure about this one in gold... Once again, thanks for the report.

Cool! And you should take a look. My preference was for the

 
 By: 219 : June 7th, 2014-01:09
original dial, but one mans food, is anthers poison! Andrew H

Great article and a lovely watch

 
 By: Steve68 : June 8th, 2014-01:06
Thanks for the article very interesting. Nearly put a deposit down on one of these last weekend but in the end didn't. Spent part of the cash on a Memovox E871 instead (TV screen). wish I had the money for both.

Welcome here, Steve. The E 871 ain't a bad choice!

 
 By: amanico : June 8th, 2014-01:08
Feel free to post some pictures of your recent catch, here, on our JLC forum. Best, Nicolas

Well as you asked

 
 By: Steve68 : June 8th, 2014-02:03
Just to say that I think there may be a problem with the hours and minutes hands on this watch and I had to put it on a NATO for now as my wrists are quite big and the leather strap it came with just isn't big enough for me. I will sort out the strap when...  

Thanks Steve! Seems that resources are being split between

 
 By: 219 : June 9th, 2014-01:08
an embarrassment of riches from JLC! Enjoy! And thanks for reading. Andrew H