Hi Nicolas - my contribution.

Jun 03, 2015,04:27 AM
 

1675 Double Swiss Underline. Mine is 87X,XXX serial. 


Cheers,
Eko


More posts: 1675GMT Master

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Let's see some Rolex 1675 Underline.

 
 By: amanico : May 22nd, 2015-03:06
When we speak about GMT underline dial, there is not only one, but three different versions. 1/ The Chapter Ring: One from 1960: One from 1963: 2/ The non Chapter Ring: Swiss only, deep black, hard to find in nice condition, as most of the dials I've seen...  

Let's suffer some more:)

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : May 22nd, 2015-04:33
Thank you dear Torquemada for this delightful pictorial As a detail I love exclamation very much what I can't say about underline From one that you presented first one looks best for me 1960 chapter ring Yours D

Exclamation dot is much less diversified, on a GMT Master.

 
 By: amanico : May 22nd, 2015-05:39
But I would not be objective to say that I don't like it! ;) Best, Damjan, and thanks for your input. Nicolic.

yes but there is also a very early ....

 
 By: marcello pisani : May 22nd, 2015-07:45
replacement dial for 6542 with underline ( still lacquered and printed SWISS only with the typical clear gold nuance that looks " silver " ). this 6542 dial version is the last one signed " SWISS " only and can be defined as mk 5. by the way in my opinion...  

Very interesting comments and infos, Marcello.

 
 By: amanico : May 22nd, 2015-08:50
First, I never saw a 6542 underline, but why not, since there are some 6542 Exclamation Dot. Then, as for the period, I saw several " - " from 1960, several quartals. And now that you wrote it, some early 1964 ones... A few. When were the " - " 6542 dials... 

Thats very interesting Marcello................

 
 By: fatboyharris : June 1st, 2015-01:08
Do you know when these services dials were introduced, are they from the 60's or later and just done in the style of the earlier 50's/60's dials? Are the hands still original to the watches you have seen with these service dials? Are these dials Radium? I... 

Splendid pictorial within an interesting post !.. Again learned quite a bit !.. Unfortunately, however,..

 
 By: hs111 : May 22nd, 2015-09:18
.. This time I can\'t be of service chipping in, as I don\'t own a 1675 (Double) Swiss/ Underline. Thus, all I can do is sending greetings with my humble other one: gilt, 1675, PCG, CR and exclamation dot (1960).. Am pretty sure, some of you may remember,...  

Rolex Gilt 5512 one upper one lower underline

 
 By: Bill : May 22nd, 2015-16:53
Here is a nice pair of Rolex Gilt 5512. The left one has the upper underline and the right one has the rare bottom underline but specifically bottom in between underline. Bill ...  

Underline Rolex watches are always educational

 
 By: Bill : May 23rd, 2015-07:09
Because we still don't really know what the purpose is "definitively". Bill

Yep! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : May 23rd, 2015-07:12

Thanks, Bill. I never saw an upper underline on a 1675.

 
 By: amanico : May 23rd, 2015-00:04
Great pair! Best, Nicolas

Thanks for sharing...

 
 By: shou.biao.kuang : May 27th, 2015-09:47
I can't seem to find much info on the underline 1675. This thread will come in handy ;)

Hi Nicolas - my contribution.

 
 By: oyster21 : June 3rd, 2015-04:27
1675 Double Swiss Underline. Mine is 87X,XXX serial. Cheers, Eko ...  

Eko, you re killing me. 2 SUPERB specimens! More pics, please.

 
 By: amanico : June 3rd, 2015-05:34
Is your SYL around 1964? Best, Nicolas

Nikolas, thx for your compliment.

 
 By: oyster21 : June 3rd, 2015-06:06
Serpico is 1.14x serial number and falls into year '64 if my memory serves me correctly. Another pic. Pardon for the quality. Gilt 1675 Cheers, Eko ...  

It is funny because normally I am not a fan of the retailer's name on a dial.

 
 By: amanico : June 3rd, 2015-06:35
But when it comes to SYL and the GMT MASTER, I am totally crazy, and if you add the fact that it is from 1964, I am mad to depth... Or almost. ;) No, seriously, I never found a GMT MASTER from 1964 with a nice dial. Yours is a delicious exception! As for ...